Just because you have a great idea and make a great product (or deliver a great service) doesn’t mean you will build a powerful brand and enjoy great success. This sad truth sometimes becomes personal when a product I love makes egregious branding errors. In fact, it really makes my blood boil.
I am an avid walker. I love walking in New York City going up the avenues and through the park. I love walking in Paris to the Eiffel Tower and through the Tullieries. I love hiking in the mountains of Austria and around the volcanoes in Maui.
I am also into fitness and new exercise trends and gadgets. I have all sorts of wobble boards, weighted balls, body bars, ankle weights, abdominal wheels and yoga mats. I also have an elliptical machine, Rollerblades, an inversion table and now MBT shoes.
I love my MBT shoes, but their branding stinks.
The point of a brand name is to get into the mind of the consumer. The better your name, the easier it is to get into the mind. Think BlackBerry.
The point of a category name is to define the niche your brand occupies in the mind. Ideally you want to be first in a new category. This will give you credibility, authenticity and instant leadership. Think Red Bull and energy drink. If you aren’t first, then you want to be the opposite of the competition. Think Monster, the 16-oz energy drink and the No.2 brand.
The point of a tagline (or positioning statement) is to give consumers a verbal message to share with one another. The test of a good tagline goes like this: If somebody asks you why you bought the brand will the tagline explain it? Does it use words consumers would use? Does it even make any sense?
Why did you buy Barilla pasta? Because it is “Italy’s #1 pasta.”
Why did you buy a Toyota? Because they are “moving forward?”
While I can see the Barilla conversation happening. I could never see the Toyota one happening. Don’t Toyotas go in reverse anymore?
MBT fails on all three counts.
The name: MBT.
Launching a brand with meaningless initials is the kiss of death. While companies like IBM and GE might be known by their initials, they actually stand for International Business Machines and General Electric. They can get away with the shorthand because they are leaders and have been around forever, IBM has been around for 84 years and GE 116 years. When you are that old and that established, you can use initials. Note: neither company ever changed their name to the initials.
Nobody knows what MBT stands for. When nobody knows your name, you can’t use initials. It just makes a bad name worse. Initials are much more difficult to remember than a name and initials communicate nothing about your brand.
What MBT stands for is Masai Barefoot Technology. Of course the full name is no good either. I doubt any tribe in Kenya would be running around in $250 shoes. And the shoes are so big and so klutzy-looking that calling them “barefoot technology” is non-sensical even if it is true. The research might say they re-create the positive effects of walking barefoot, but they don’t give that impression at first glance. And perception is everything.
Furthermore, they don’t even own mbt.com! The brand’s website is swissmasaius.com. If you have a bad name, at least you should own the bad name website.
What MBT needs is a name like Crocs. Simple, different, memorable and a name alludes to the product. If Crocs were called PSTs (Plastic Shoe Technology), they would never have become the billion-dollar brand they are today.
The category: What is the category? Nobody knows.
MBT calls itself “physiological footwear.” Huh? What is that? Nobody is going to use that as a category name. What kind of physiological footwear do you wear? I don’t think so.
A category name should contain simple words and be easy to understand. And don’t trademark it. If you want to get big, you need your category to get big. And for your category to get big, you need competition. As long as you are the leading brand, having a flock of followers behind you is a good thing.
What are some good category names: energy drink, sports drink, energy bar, expensive coffee, wireless email, safe car, packaged salad, performance underwear, natural cosmetics, organic groceries. Of course, the brands that dominates these categories are the brands that introduced the category (Red Bull, Gatorade, PowerBar, Starbucks, BlackBerry, Volvo, Fresh Express, Under Armour, The Body Shop and Whole Foods.)
In this emerging shoe category there are several brands and several words floating around to describe them. There is no consistency and no one idea to describe the category that makes sense to consumers. This is going to be devastating to MBT. Some call them “rolly shoes.” I call them “rockers.” Others call them wobbly or balance shoes. The names are all over the place.
Another company makes a flip-flop version called FitFlop which it says has “patent-pending micro-wobbleboard technology.” Walking with wobble boards on my feet doesn’t seem like a safe idea. Nor a good branding idea.
All this chaos undermines the potential of the category because nobody understands it or knows what to call it. While MBT has avid fans like me, they don’t have a clear message for the general public or the media to spread the word.
In addition to the confusion over the category name, there is confusion over the benefit of the shoes. MBT’s benefits range from the ridiculous “cellulite removal” to the relatively tame “improved posture.”
A brand should have one clear benefit. The benefit like the category name should be simple, specific, understandable and believable. For MBT is could be: “Makes every walk a workout.” Or “Get 30% more workout in every step.” The more crazy the benefit the less believable it is.
For Amazon.com the benefit was “30% off all books.” For iPod the benefit was “1,000 songs.” For Papa John’s Pizza the benefit is “better ingredients, better pizza.”
The tagline: First problem, MBT has two. Second problem, neither is any good.
Brands should have one tagline and use it everywhere: websites, advertising, letterheads, business cards etc. Having a brand tagline “physiological footwear” and an advertising tagline “the anti-shoe” makes no sense. Two taglines are not better than one.
Obviously the agency for MBT took one look at the current brand tagline and said we can’t use that!
So they came up with “The anti-shoe.” The anti-shoe? MBTs are the biggest, ugliest shoes ever made! How can they ever be known as the anti-shoe? Answer: they can’t.
But they can be known as the ultimate workout shoe. Every step, every day is a workout.
The thing I like most about MBT shoes is that they are so different looking. Every single time I wear them people notice these shoes and stop me to comment on MBTs. They are like the lime in the top of the Corona bottle. You can’t miss the difference.
Geox is a fantastic shoe brand known as “breathable shoes,” but the difference is unnoticeable. Unless you look at the bottom of somebody’s feet, there is no way to see the holes that allow the shoes to breathe.
When people see MBTs, they can’t help but to ask: What are they? What do they do? Do they work? Where did I get them? When this happens it pains me because the brand is missing a big opportunity. My answers to these questions are weak because the brand is weak. The terrible name, a shaky position and unnamed category leave me with a difficult story to tell about them. Without word of mouth no brand can thrive.
If you are single, you might get a pair of MBT shoes. For some reason guys at the gym see these shoes as the perfect excuse to come and talk to me. One guy said “At first I thought you had the funny shoes because one leg was shorter than the other.” Guess he thought that was a funny line.
MBT has got to be careful because FitFlop is moving in. They have a memorable and descriptive name along with a cleaver tagline "It's the flip-flop with the gym built in."
MBT shoes are a great product but a lousy brand. Such a shame.


Of course there are exceptions to the rule that initials suck -- IBM/BMW/ICI/ have been around for years and basically just get away with it. But introduce a new brand using initials? Have a go! You'll also see many under-the-radar business-to-business brands that don't really give a toss about how cool their name sounds. They operate in the rational space (selling drills to a motherboard manufacturer), not a world where consumers dream of snow and the Alps while sipping from an over-priced bottle of tap water. Where are all the posts about business-to-business branding?
Posted by: Gordon | June 06, 2008 at 08:50 PM
> Roger, no problem with the long names when people are using shortcuts
> referring to them.
Linas, I agree in that the long name is not what's sticking in the mind of the consumer. The "shortcut" is the brand name in the mind of the consumer.
> When they are using shortcuts, they know for what these shortcuts stand.
Often, consumers do NOT know the long names for which the shortcuts stand. I'll bet that a significant number of consumers can't tell you what "IBM" abbreviates.
Posted by: Roger L. Cauvin | June 02, 2008 at 12:29 PM
I'll have to say this article has been one of the best I have read EVER it really simplify what other marketers try to complicate. That's what I love with origin of brands blog and RIESreport.com it's easy to understand and get straight to a key point.
I first got introduced to MBT in a family gathering my first thought was I didn't get the idea at first it too complicated and it required a lot of explaining to get the idea of the "barefoot" shoe. My first impression was what a bad brand name. I never remember the name is it mbt or bmt? I had to look at the article to make sure I used the right name. What a lousy name.
My mother bought these shoe and is VERY satisfied with the them and have bought more since the product is great. But without the word-of-mouth and explaining the idea would never had come across. That's a really slow way to build a brand.
Posted by: Jim | June 02, 2008 at 10:30 AM
Laura,
As a fitness/athletic trainer, I can't recommend Vibram five fingers shoes enough. I've turned a countless number of my clients unto them and now they absolutely can't train without them. Sorry but I say the marketing is definitely built in the product. Five fingers spends zero dollars on marketing and advertising, yet every fitness community and message board I've been on has threads and threads of people talking them up.
Here's the site link, which mind you, I have zero stake in (lol!):
Oh yea they're great for hiking as well!
http://www.vibramfivefingers.com/
Posted by: Steve Liberati | May 30, 2008 at 07:26 PM
I will have to read your blog all the time. It is fantastic! One of your friends sent a link to you from Etsy.
Posted by: Nina | May 29, 2008 at 09:23 AM
When I first saw this shoe, I nearly spewed. It is harder to look at than an episode of Tila Tequila's Shot @ Love 2.
The ad had a full paragraph of witty banter, but said absolutely nothing. Clever copy does not a brand make!
I am about as likely to purchase a pair of MBTs as I am to buy a copy of Scarlett Johansson's album (and listen to it).
The agency who landed the MBT account, Kastner & Partners, a German ad agency with U.S. headquarters in L.A. (via LA Biz Journal) made a grip of coin on this deal. Perhaps they can use their wealth to buy a clue (and a new creative team). I'm looking for account-side work; hire me!
Der.
Posted by: B3N | May 28, 2008 at 01:52 PM
Funny no one (including the author of this post) happen to mention that the MBTs are UGLIER THAN SIN and make you look indeed like a person with a orthopedic deformity at best or more likely The Addams Family butler. Maybe the tv and radio spots should use Lurch's deep-voice voice: "MBT - You raaaaaan ?"
Granted, you might try to justify your reasoning by arguing that perhaps sports and fitness are not about elegance or self-dignity in the short term, but ultimately about a healthy life and breaking your own limits. But then you are getting dangerously close to this [NSFW] scenario: http://img393.imageshack.us/img393/9823/nsfwhedidntwinbuthecamerk7.jpg
Posted by: Ricardo | May 25, 2008 at 04:27 PM
MBT must have something attract your buying attention...or they gave you a free pair.
Hey...what about walking around your home area rather than all the big cities around the globe? Living in the Hot 'Lanta area just as you, I do it every day.
Happy Memorial Day weekend! Be safe.
Posted by: Greg Gillispie | May 23, 2008 at 09:18 AM
Thank you for sharing!
Posted by: Cristian Paduraru (from DJ Friendly Private Promo Pool) | May 23, 2008 at 03:58 AM
Also, why would the ad agency shoot the shoe image from the top down perspective?
It minimizes the distinctive product difference which is the sole of the shoe, and makes it look like every other shoe ad. Surely you would want to celebrate how unusual the shape is?
Also that ad makes the shoe look like one of my 5 year old daughters shoes.
MBT, what a crap name.
Posted by: Fiona | May 23, 2008 at 03:03 AM
Roger, no problem with the long names when people are using shortcuts referring to them. Think L.A. instead of Los Angeles, IBM instead International Business Machines or Fedex instead of Federal Express. When they are using shortcuts, they know for what these shortcuts stand.
Problem arises when you don't have a clue what the shortcut is about. Can you remember for what MBT stands? That's a problem, a big marketing problem.
Posted by: Linas Simonis | May 23, 2008 at 02:56 AM
@Laura
I totally agree with what your saying and I have the same perception as what you do on certain things, but then again I could disagree the reason I say that for is because sometimes the service is what makes the name credible and makes people talk about it.
For example one of my fathers good friends was a very excellent business man his company was on the fortune 500 list. I think it was like in the top 200 or something like that well anyways there name was BCW (nothing special) they did no advertising or anything, but what they did do was create something that was innovative.
They came into a market that was in need of something and met the conditions, therefore this made them grow very fast, but at the same time they were charging higher prices then all the competitors.
What aloud them to do this was because they was meeting the demand like the buyers wanted therefore making them grow fast, but at the same time creating a name that every one fell in love with.
I do believe in what your saying about people should talk about the name and etc. The image should be put into there head, but I think the quality of the service is what creates the good image for the name.
For example BMW well you go buy a BMW you know your getting a good car, why? Because it is a BMW they focus on nothing, but higher quality cars.
Posted by: Tyler Dewitt | May 22, 2008 at 04:57 PM
It's amazing what marketing departments come up with, isn't it?
On the topic of brand names that are initials, I consider "IBM" to be a better brand name than "International Business Machines". People say "IBM" because "International Business Machines" is far too long and so generic as to be almost meaningless.
So while initials don't make good brand names, they often make much better brand names than the lengthy, generic names for which they stand.
Posted by: Roger L. Cauvin | May 22, 2008 at 09:30 AM
I couldn't agree more. Everything about this company is bad, including their website (which looks like some high tech software maker).
They are trying to be everything to everyone...the kiss of death for a brand.
Posted by: BIG Kahuna | May 22, 2008 at 09:19 AM