Some have said Positioning is dead. No way, I say. Positioning is alive and well. Successful brands are still the ones using the most powerful concept ever to be introduced into advertising, marketing and branding.
One of the best-selling advertising books at Amazon.com continues to Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind written by my father, Al Ries and Jack Trout, a book first published 22 years ago. Positioning has become famous. No company would launch a new brand today without first writing a positioning statement.
But many people have forgotten what positioning is all about. When you study these statements you can see where many marketing people have gotten off the track. In general, they are written from the company’s point of view. “We want to position our brand as the premier product in the category.” What’s wrong with a positioning statement like this? Everything. It leaves the prospect out of the equation. If you want to position a product from the prospect’s point of view, you have a limited number of choices. Here are six possibilities.
1. The Open Hole.
Price is the easiest hole in the mind to understand and it’s one of the easiest holes to fill. Haagen-Dazs’ decision to introduce a more expensive line of ice cream set up the "premium" ice cream position for the brand and made Haagen-Dazs one of the enduring marketing successes of the past several decades. What Haagen-Dazs did in ice cream, Heineken did in beer, Rembrandt in toothpaste, Evian in water, Orville Redenbacher in popcorn, Rolex in watches, Mercedes-Benz in automobiles. High price is only one of the open holes in the mind. Low price is another. What Haagen-Dazs did at the high end, brands like Wal-Mart and Southwest Airlines are doing at the low end.
2. The New Category.
Sometimes there are no open holes in the prospect’s mind and you have to create one. We call this positioning strategy, “create a new category you can be first in.” Gatorade, for example, was the first sports drink. PowerBar was the first energy bar. Red Bull was the first energy drink. UnderArmour was the first in performance workout clothing. Zima was the first ... well, what was Zima the first of? The label said “ClearMalt,” but nobody knew what that meant. The television announcement ads were no help either. “What’s in it?” asked a bartender. “It’s a secret. It’s something different,” replied a mysterious pitchman in his white suit and black hat.
3. The Number-two Brand.
Consumers like choice. Sometimes you can build a powerful brand just by giving consumers an alternative to the leading brand. But what strategy can best deliver the No. 2 position? “Maybe if we can produce a better product than the leader,” goes the thinking, “we won’t necessarily overtake them, but we will wind up in the number two position.” This is the worst possible approach. Why is this so? Because the leader in your field already has the perception of producing the better product. Then how do you become a strong number two brand? You become the opposite of the leader. Coke was for older people, so Pepsi became the cola for younger people. Listerine was the bad-tasting mouthwash that killed germs and odor in your mouth. So Scope became the good-tasting mouthwash and a strong number-two brand. Home Depot is the leading home-improvement store, but its crowded aisles and jammed shelves appeal more to men than women. So Lowe’s became the home-improvement store for women with clean layouts and wide aisles.
4. The Specialist.
Every coffee shop in America sells coffee, but they also sell hamburgers, hot dogs, French fries, apple pie, donuts and dozens of other foods and beverages. So Starbucks specialized in coffee and became a very successful brand. So did McDonald’s which specialized in hamburgers. And Dunkin’ Donuts which specialized in donuts. And Subway which specialized in submarine sandwiches. Enterprise Rent-A-Car specialized in the “insurance replacement” business and became the largest car rental company in America.
5. The Channel Brand.
Sometimes you can position a brand to fill a channel hole. L’eggs, the first supermarket panty-hose brand, became the largest-selling panty-hose brand in the country. Today there are opportunities to create Internet channel brands. Amazon.com, eBay, Monster.com and Salesforce.com are just some of many successful “Internet-only” brands. Paul Mitchell became a $600 million hair and skin-care brand by focusing on the professional hair salon channel. Ping did the same in golf clubs by focusing on the pro-shop channel.
6. The Gender Brand.
Sometimes you can build a big brand by focusing on half the market.
Marlboro because a big brand by positioning itself as the first cigarette for men.
Virginia Slims became a big brand by positioning itself as the first cigarette for women.
Curves became a big brand by positionging itself as the gym for women.
Secret became a big brand by positioning itself as the first deodorant for women.
There’s a lot more to say about the subject of positioning. I suggest you get yourself a copy of the 20th anniversary edition of Positioning. You can’t go wrong if you simply take your mind off your product, your brand and your company and focus instead on the mind of the consumer. Since it is in the mind of the consumer that the real marketing battle is won or lost.
I love u and your dad and admire your work
A great fan
Said Baaghil
Posted by: baaghil | August 2004 at 04:07 AM
Laura
I am a fan of your dad and yourself, I have followed all your articles and learnt a great deal as a marketer, I am also registerd on your website www.ries.com. I admire your approach and I wish that one day I will be able to present my views to you in person.
Posted by: Said Baaghil | August 2004 at 04:06 AM
You can only change a position in very few cicumstances.
#1 If nobody knows you, then it is no problem to change your name, your position, your entire brand strategy.
#2 In a slow moving category, change can happen over decades. Citibank used to be a business bank. Today, 20 years later Citibank is a consumer bank.
#3 You are moving your brand down. Rolls-Royce has a strong brand, but at $300,000 they don't sell too many cars. They could move the brand to a cheaper position, say $100,000 cars. But they would have to give up the high-end of the market.
Where change is not possible is when your brand is already positioned in the mind. For example, Kodak is never going to be able to change its brand to mean digital.
For Kodak the best option would be to launch a second brand. Just like Toyota would never have been able to change its brand to mean luxury. So they launched a new brand Lexus, which is a big success.
Posted by: Laura Ries | July 2004 at 04:46 PM
Hi! I am astudent of fashion & apparel and your write up has really helped me for my project. thank you!I am sure I can use these tips as a professional in near future.
Posted by: Ayesha | July 2004 at 10:37 AM
Very interesting information, I just got my copy of "Positioning: The Battle for your Mind". I am looking forward to reading it and taking your idea's and making my Inn something special and it's OK to be #2 as long as we make money and are profitable!
Posted by: John Hoskins | July 2004 at 03:38 PM
Hi Laura,
Great interview with BJ Olin!
This is all well and good but I would be interested to hear how difficult it is for your market position to change.
For expample, say a company decides after entering a market that the position they chose was not as opportune as they had initially anticipated? How difficult and detrimental would it be to change?
I would imagine it would be easier for a smaller company to change its market position than a larger one.
What are your thoughts? (maybe a followup posting)
Posted by: Travis McMenimon | July 2004 at 02:57 PM
Hello...or salut(in romanian)
What you wrote is really interesting. It is sad that here in Romania this concept it is not understood so well.There are a few companies who are really making the difference.
Thank you
Ani
Posted by: ANI | July 2004 at 05:11 AM
these are really interesting strategies. in some ways akin to the 5 plays we espouse on our blog and our book.
i would say that of similar importance to the gender brand is the ethnic brand. one company we love is baidu. it is the chinese google. it's done very well. just look at how important latin, indian and korean brands are to thier targets.
thanks, john
Posted by: johnza | July 2004 at 12:19 AM
Interesting article. It's refreshing to see a topic like this explained in just a few words. Most books about branding take just one of the forms you describe and dedicate 500+ pages to examples and rules.
Did you read the book "Disruption" by Jean Marie Dru? It fits your theory perfectly and takes it a couple of steps further.
Posted by: Joost | July 2004 at 01:36 PM
Hi Laura!
Your blog seems very interesting, I'll follow it with pleasure.
Gloria
(Italy)
Posted by: Gloria | July 2004 at 09:53 AM